Clay alternatives
16 other B2B Waterfall Enrichment tools, ranked by Autonomous Execution Score. Each is measured against Clay: AES 67, not verified.
Why teams look past Clay
- Credit consumption can become expensive rapidly
- Spreadsheet-style learning curve
From Clay's verified tradeoffs. Full profile
Moving off Clay? Tell us your team and budget and we'll pick the 3 best replacements.
All 16 alternatives
| # | Tool | AutonomyAES | From | Shared integrations | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75 +8 | Not verified | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 2 | 72 +5 | Contact sales | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 3 | 71 +4 | $99/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 4 | 71 +4 | Contact sales | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 5 | 68 +1 | $55/mo | 1/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 6 | 68 +1 | $99/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 7 | 67 ±0 | $0/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 9 | 64 −3 | $0/mo | 1/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 10 | 64 −3 | $0/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 11 | 64 −3 | $0/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 12 | 63 −4 | Contact sales | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 13 | 60 −7 | $0/mo | 0/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 14 | 60 −7 | $597/mo | 3/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 15 | 60 −7 | Not verified | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 16 | 60 −7 | Not verified | 2/5 | Compare ↗ | |
| 17 | 56 −11 | $0/mo | 2/5 | Compare ↗ |
Autonomy shows each tool's AES and its gap to Clay. Shared integrations counts the Clay integrations it also supports, a rough guide to switching effort. How scoring works